Connect with us

Published

on

Democratic politicians and media pundits have tried to push the narrative that President Trump is personally responsible for the unrest that happened on January 6th since the day it happened.  The scam has gone so far that the corrupt January 6th Committee is considering referring Trump to the Department of Justice to be criminally prosecuted.

An Ohio man who was just convicted for his involvement in the protests further proves that the Unselect Committee has no legal standing to criminally prosecute Trump.

Dustin Byron Thompson, a 38-year-old man who entered the Capitol at the January 6th protests was just convicted on all six charges brought against him.

Thomspon’s defense attorneys attempted to use the defense that he was manipulated by Donald Trump and his inner circle, including Rudy Giuliani, into storming the Capitol.

The judge and jury rejected his defense and held him solely responsible for his actions.  Thompson could face up to 26 years in prison.

The Daily Mail Reports-

“An Ohio man who said he was only ‘following presidential orders’ when he stormed the Capitol and stole a coat rack and a bottle of bourbon was quickly convicted Thursday of obstructing Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

Dustin Byron Thompson, 38, was found guilty on all six counts against him, including theft of government property and disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or ground. The jury took less than three hours to deliberate.

The FBI had found cell phone footage of Thompson inside the Senate parliamentarian’s ransacked office yelling: ‘Wooooo! ‘Merica Hey! This is our house!’

Thompson now faces 20 years in prison for the obstruction count, the lone felony. He will be held in jail until his sentencing on July 20.

Jurors rejected Thompson’s novel defense, in which he blamed Trump and members of the president’s inner circle for the insurrection and for his own actions.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments

Congress

BREAKING BOMBSHELL: Pelosi’s Capitol Police Reportedly Broke Into Office of GOP Rep Critical of J6 Committee…Photographed Confidential Docs…Days Later, Intelligence Agents Dressed Like Construction Workers Questioned Staff Member About Contents Of Illegally Photographed Docs

Published

on

Texas’s outspoken Republican Congressman Troy Nehls has dropped a bombshell on Twitter.

In a stunning series of tweets, Congressman Nehls outlines a scenario that one would expect to read in a Russian spy novel, and certainly not in the United States of America.

Rep. Nehls, a vocal critic of the partisan hack January 6th Committee and of the shooting death of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt, tweeted about a discovery made by staffers in his office over the Thanksgiving break in November 2021.

Nehls tweeted:

Police cars revolving lightBREAKINGPolice cars revolving lightThe @CapitolPolice Intelligence Division investigated my office illegally, and one of my staffers caught them in the act.

On November 20th, 2021, Capitol Police entered my office without my knowledge and photographed confidential legislative products protected by the Speech and Debate clause enshrined in the Constitution, Article 1 Section 6.

Two days later, on Monday, November 22, 2021 (Thanksgiving week), three intelligence officers attempted to enter my office while the House was in recess.

Upon discovering a member of my staff, special agents dressed like construction workers began to question him as to the contents of a photograph taken illegally two days earlier.

@CapitolPolice never informed myself or senior-level staff of their investigation, and the reasons are clear.

They had no authority to photograph my office, let alone investigate myself or members of my staff. So, why is the Capitol Police Leadership maliciously investigating me in an attempt to destroy me and my character?

Maybe it is because I have been a vocal critic of  @SpeakerPelosi, the @January6thCmte, and @CapitolPolice leadership about their handling of January 6th, the death of Ashli Babbitt, and the subsequent SHAM investigation.

National Pulse reports – Capitol Police Chief J. Thomas Manger confirmed the Inspector General has now opened an investigation after receiving multiple congressional inquiries into the Capitol Police tactics, such as those reported by Politico. Capitol Police intelligence analysts have also raised concerns to the inspector general over the department’s practice.

Politico – Several Capitol Police intelligence analysts have already raised concerns about the practice to the department’s inspector general, according to one of the people who spoke for this story.

The Capitol Police, in a statement, defended the practice of searching for public information about people meeting with lawmakers and said the department coordinates the work with members’ offices.

Major changes in the Capitol Police intelligence unit started in the fall of 2020 when the department brought on former Department of Homeland Security official Julie Farnam to help run its intelligence unit, which is housed in its Intelligence and Interagency Coordination Division. In the weeks before the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, Farnam made a host of changes to internal intelligence protocols that “caused internal confusion” and “scrambled the priorities” of the unit’s analysts, according to CNN.

Then, in the months after the riot, Farnam changed another key process in a way that hasn’t been previously reported.

Watch Nancy Pelosi’s US Capitol Police Chief Manger explain to US Senators how the US Capitol Police Department has “doubled” the number of police members to address the “threats.” Did he mean to say they’ve increased the number of Capitol Police needed to spy on members of Congress who opposed and expose the lies of Nancy Pelosi and friends?

For years, analysts in the department’s intelligence division have put together documents called Congressional Event Assessments. That process entails the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, Congress’ chambers’ internal logistical and security leaders, sharing information with Capitol Police on lawmakers’ plans for meetings and events away from the Capitol.

Intelligence division analysts then use that information to assess physical safety risks to those events — things such as large, planned protests, parades, concerts, or other events that would draw crowds. Analysts regularly filled out a standard template with that assessment.

But after the Capitol attack, Farnam changed the template. According to a copy that POLITICO reviewed, she directed analysts to look closely at the people meeting privately and publicly with members.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Fox News

SHAMEFUL: FOX Business Host Liz Claman Condemns Jan. 6 Protesters to Life Behind Bars without Pardon

Published

on

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Congress

Congress claims sovereign immunity prevents Capitol Police from sharing January 6 emails and videos

Published

on

Judicial Watch is challenging an attempt by the U.S Capitol Police to block the watchdog organization’s federal lawsuit to gain access to videos and emails related to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.  

Congress, via the police department, is arguing that the videos and emails being sought are not matters of public record and that there is no public interest in their release. Furthermore, the body is claiming that sovereign immunity prevents citizens from suing for their release.

The suit was filed by Judicial Watch under the common law right of access after the Capitol Police refused to provide requested records in response to the group’s initial request dating back to January 2021.

The initial request was for emails between the USCP executive team and the Capitol Police board pertaining to the security of the Capitol complex on the day of the riot and emails among the USCP and the FBI, Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security.

The group additionally asked for all video footage from within the Capitol from noon to 9 p.m. on the day of the riot. 

The suit was filed under the common law right of access to public records because Congress exempts itself from the Freedom of Information Act. 

“In ‘the courts of this country’ – including the federal courts – the common law bestows upon the public a right of access to public records and documents … the Supreme Court was unequivocal in stating that there is a federal common law right of access ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents.’ … [T]he general rule is that all three branches of government, legislative, executive, and judicial, are subject to the common law right.” The right of access is a precious “common law right … that predates the Constitution itself,” writes Judicial Watch, citing Supreme Court precedent that upholds the public’s right to understand what “their government is up to.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said of the issue, “The Pelosi Congress (and its police department) is telling a federal court it is immune from all transparency under law and is trying to hide every second of its January 6 videos and countless emails. The hypocrisy is rich, as this is the same Congress that is trying to jail witnesses who, citing privileges, object to providing documents to the Pelosi rump January 6 committee.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Trending

Back