Connect with us



AU.S. Defense contractor is under investigation following allegations of stealing up to $50 million from the U.S. Navy.

According to the Washington Post, Frank Rafaraci—the contractor in this case—is accused of overcharging the Navy from 2011 to 2018. The company Rafaraci worked for was Multinational Logistics Services (MLS).

Currently, the contractor is in Malta, and the Justice Department is working on an extradition order so he can face charges back here in the U.S.

The company was responsible for servicing warships sent to the Middle East, and other parts of Asia. The company received over $1 billion in revenue from the Defense Department over a 10-year span. 

In the indictment, the Justice Department alleges that one example of corruption includes MLS charging the U.S. in excess of $200,000 just for “port authority fees.” However, court documents show the port the ship was docked at only charges $12,000 in order to dock.

According to a statement obtained by The Hill from Navy spokesperson Lt. Andrew Degarmo, the federal government has been “actively coordinating with other law enforcement authorities around the globe” to apprehend the defendants. 

“The Department of the Navy expects all individuals and companies with whom it conducts business to act with the highest degree of integrity and to have effective standards of conduct,” Degarmo added.

Besides federal fraud, Rafaraci faces money laundering and bribery charges.


Federal Agency

Postal Service hacking into hundreds of seized mobile devices, tracking users’ social media posts



Watchdog groups are sounding the alarm on the law enforcement arm of the U.S. Postal Service, which they say is violating the privacy and civil liberties of the American people by using sophisticated tools to break into hundreds of citizens’ cellphones and collect their social media posts.

Until now, it’s gone largely unpublicized that the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) admitted in its 2020 annual report that it not only employed top-of-the-line technology hundreds of times to hack into mobile phones but also planned to expand its use of the hacking tools in the future.

“The Cellebrite Premium and GrayKey tools acquired in [fiscal year] 2019 and 2018 allow the Digital Evidence Unit to extract previously unattainable information from seized mobile devices,” the 2020 report states. “During FY 2020, 331 devices were processed, and 242 were unlocked and/or extracted by these services. The success of the program and ever-increasing demand for services required the purchase this year of a second GrayKey device for use on the East Coast.”

The USPIS’s figures indicate a surge in such hackings compared to 2019, when the agency disclosed it accessed 34 devices using Cellebrite and 143 with GrayKey.

Last week, the Epoch Times first reported on the agency’s use of hacking tools to access encrypted mobile devices.

The new technology used by USPIS has found workarounds to break into phones, unscramble otherwise unreadable encrypted data, and copy it for law enforcement to go through.

This technology is dangerous and prone to abuse, according to Jake Wiener, a law fellow at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), who argued these tools violate one’s privacy and are often unnecessary.

“Cellphones contain multitudes of intimate information about all aspects of our lives, messages with family, private pictures, records of our movements, and much more,” Wiener told Just the News. “Phone hacking tools are a direct threat to privacy because they can expose information that everyone wants to keep private, and would be irrelevant to a criminal investigation.”

Forensic tools like Cellebrite and GrayKey “give investigators the ability to access and analyze far more information than ever before,” said Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel for the American Civil Liberty Union’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “This includes information people do not know is on their devices, such as deleted and temporarily stored data. Forensic tools can unlock and extract private information that is irrelevant to an investigation, and there are inadequate safeguards in place to make sure this information will not be misused.”

Wiener, Granick, and other critics of the USPIS program note it’s unclear for which crimes and investigations the agency uses hacking tools to access locked phones, raising concerns that the criteria are arbitrary and could lead to the government agency abusing its power.

The bar for using this hacking technology should be quite high, if it’s used at all, and governed by strict oversight, privacy advocates say. Others counter that, in cases where national security and the lives of Americans are at risk, authorities should have greater ability to obtain potentially critical information quickly.

USPIS declined to comment on how it determines when to use Cellebrite Premium and GrayKey tools to extract data from seized mobile devices. However, the agency suggested it follows federal law in all cases, including by obtaining a warrant.

“Only a limited number of individuals have access to these tools, and they are used in accordance with legal requirements,” a USPIS spokesperson told Just the News. “A search warrant, court order, or other constitutionally permissible situation must exist prior to any digital evidence examination of cell phones.”

If a federal agency wants to use new technologies like Cellebrite’s phone hacking tool, the E-Government Act of 2002 requires the agency to first go through a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), which should disclose the risks to individual privacy created when the agency uses the technology, ways to mitigate the risk, and ask whether using the technology is

USPIS didn’t answer an inquiry asking whether it produced a PIA.

“If the Postal Inspection Service hasn’t done a PIA for Cellebrite and GrayKey, that suggests the agency is not considering the harmful effects of using this technology or putting sufficient safeguards in place to prevent abuse,” said Wiener. “If they have, it is not published on their website.”

Accessing cell phones hasn’t been the only source of controversy for USPIS. Yahoo News revealed last year that the agency has been “quietly running a program that tracks and collects Americans’ social media posts, including those about planned protests.”

The surveillance effort, known as the Internet Covert Operations Program, iCOP, involves analysts going through social media sites to flag “inflammatory” posts and share that information across the federal government.

iCOP’s official mandate is the “identification, disruption, and dismantling of individuals and organizations that use the mail or USPS online tools to facilitate black market trade or other illegal activities.”

The program has used facial recognition technology and social media monitoring services to surveil individuals, including protesters demonstrating against everything from police brutality to COVID-19 lockdown measures.

“Government monitoring and retention of information about First Amendment-protected speech increases the likelihood that agencies will investigate or otherwise monitor people based on that speech,” said Granick. “It also risks chilling expressive activity … These risks and consequences are even more severe when the government uses powerful tools to compile digital dossiers and track online speech, networks, and associations.”

Last year, EPIC filed a lawsuit under the E-Government Act of 2002 to stop USPIS from continuing the program, noting the agency has yet to publish a PIA.

Judicial Watch also sued the Postal Service last year, launching a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information about the surveillance effort.

“The questionable surveillance schemes appear to indicate that the government is weaponizing the nation’s postal service to improperly spy on the citizens who fund it,” said Judicial Watch. “Why would the government depend on the Postal Service to examine the internet for security reasons?”

The organization is also filing a FOIA request with the Postal Service for information on the devices used by the agency to hack cell phones.

Critics argue USPIS is pushing outside the scope of its mission and needs to be held accountable.

“In recent years, the Inspection Service has gone outside its mission to monitor protesters across the country using facial recognition and social media monitoring tools, without even implementing basic privacy protections required by federal law,” according to Wiener. “The USPIS believes it’s not subject to the baseline rules that govern other agencies.”

The Postal Service is exempt from several rules that govern other agencies under the Postal Reorganization Act, leading some to question the proper role of USPIS.

“There’s something very weird about having a law enforcement agency built into a postal service,” Wiener told Just the News. “It’s not a format you see anywhere else.”

Several civil liberties experts expressed similar concerns to Yahoo News last year, questioning how the USPIS mandate can include some of its activities.

“If the individuals they’re monitoring are carrying out or planning criminal activity, that should be the purview of the FBI,” said Rachel Levinson-Waldman, deputy director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s liberty and national security program. “If they’re simply engaging in lawfully protected speech, even if it’s odious or objectionable, then monitoring them on that basis raises serious constitutional concerns.”

Just the News asked USPIS to respond to critics alleging the agency is violating Americans’ privacy and civil liberties and going outside the scope of its mission. The agency declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Federal Agency

Previously deported illegal immigrant arrested for $2 million in pandemic unemployment fraud



A woman arrested in New York along with an unnamed “coconspirator” for allegedly perpetrating $1.9 million of pandemic unemployment fraud was a previously deported illegal immigrant, Just the News has learned.

Yohauris Rodriguez Hernandez, a citizen of the Dominican Republic, was convicted for running a tax fraud scheme in 2014. She was deported upon her release from prison in 2017. Together, Hernandez and Gerardo Enmanuel Luna Marmolejos stole more than 40,000 identities to file fraudulent income tax returns and collect refunds from the IRS.

Hernandez reentered the U.S. illegally after her previous deportation and went on to commit more alleged offenses, this time related to pandemic unemployment fraud, as Hernandez and her coconspirator filed fake unemployment claims with stolen information and collected weekly payments.

A Department of Justice spokesperson told Just the News that Hernandez committed the fraud across three separate states. Her schemes came to light after she left behind New York Department of Labor unemployment debit cards issued to scores of individuals in a hotel room in Yonkers, N.Y., according to a DOJ press release.

“From February 2020 through December 2020, YOHAURIS RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ and a co-conspirator (‘CC-1’) engaged in a scheme to obtain COVID-19 unemployment benefits through the fraudulent filing and verification of applications using the names and social security numbers of at least 100 other people,” read the DOJ release. 

“Law enforcement agencies were first alerted to the scheme after YOHAURIS RODIRGUEZ HERNANDEZ and CC-1 fled a Yonkers hotel in December 2020 leaving behind in their previously occupied room over 500 pieces of NYS DOL mail containing information and NYS DOL-issued debit cards for approximately 76 individuals,” the release reported.

Hernandez was arrested at an immigration detention center on Jan. 19, according to DOJ.

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) spokesperson confirmed that Hernandez didn’t commit the pandemic unemployment fraud at the immigration detention center. The spokesperson said she likely managed to illegally reenter the country undetected after her deportation in 2017 before later committing the pandemic-related fraud.

In March of 2020, the $2.2 trillion CARES Act established Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) and allowed self-employed individuals to apply for jobless benefits. A bonus federal jobless payment was added on top of state benefits for self-employed individuals. Security experts have said this new allowance opened the floodgates for fraudsters. The U.S. Department of Labor has estimated that as much as $90 billion was paid in jobless benefits to ineligible applicants.

Hernandez is one of many individuals federal law enforcement officials have charged for fraud related to COVID-19 jobless benefits or forgivable loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP).

For example, a Social Security Administration employee was charged for using stolen personal information to apply for  PUA. The individual, Takiyah Gordon Austin was charged on July 20, 2021, and the case was formally unsealed on Aug. 12, 2021.

Continue Reading

Abortion Law

Federal Judge overturns Texas abortion law…




AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday ordered Texas to suspend the most restrictive abortion law in the U.S., calling it an “offensive deprivation” of a constitutional right by banning most abortions in the nation’s second-most populous state since September.

The order by U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman is the first legal blow to the Texas law known as Senate Bill 8, which until now had withstood a wave of early challenges. In the weeks since the restrictions took effect, Texas abortion providers say the impact has been “exactly what we feared.”

Pitman took Texas to task over the law, saying Republicans lawmakers had “contrived an unprecedented and transparent statutory scheme” to deny patients their constitutional right to an abortion.

“That other courts may find a way to avoid this conclusion is theirs to decide; this Court will not sanction one more day of this offensive deprivation of such an important right.”

Texas officials are likely to seek a swift reversal from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which previously allowed the restrictions to take effect. State officials did not immediately react to the ruling.

The lawsuit was brought by the Biden administration.

Continue Reading